Supremes side with Wal-Mart ... and that's a good thing

The U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision blocked an attempt to wrap several sex discrimination lawsuits against Wal-Mart into a single class action lawsuit.

The move allows each case to proceed on its own and that's the way it should be. If Wal-Mart has discriminated against a particular employee, then let that employee seek relief by presenting her facts to the court. To allow unlike cases to be lumped into one simply becomes a mechanism by which tee-vee type lawyers may play judicial lotto by contingency. (Mee-lee-thee-me-omah.) In Wal-Mart's case, it is also another ploy for unions and their beholden politicians and judges to try to unionize the nation's largest retailer.

This is a just ruling. The fact that the decision was 5-4, however, ought to worry us all.


Comment section guidelines

The below comment section contains thoughts and opinions from users that in no way represent the views of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. This public platform is intended to provide a forum for users of to share ideas, express thoughtful opinions and carry the conversation beyond the article. Users must follow the guidelines under our Commenting Policy and are encouraged to use the moderation tools to help maintain civility and keep discussions on topic.

View Comments