[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Las Vegas Review-JournalDonrey Newspapers
Review-Journal Online
HOME PAGE

HEADLINES
SECTIONS
NEWS
SPORTS
   Betting Line
BUSINESS
LIFESTYLES
NEON
   Dining
   Showguide
   Nightlife
   Movies
   TV Listings
OPINION
   Columnists
OBITUARIES
CLASSIFIEDS
   Auto Guide
WEATHER
REAL ESTATE
Subscribe to the RJ
  Archive
Fun Stuff
  Crosswords
  Kids Area
  Gallery
Extras
  Newspaper Subscription
  Contact Us
Friday, April 07, 2000
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Critics blast military study that says chaff is not harmful


     Associated Press
     
RENO -- Environmental and military watchdog groups have denounced a study from the Naval Research Laboratory that found no health risks in the continued use of military chaff.
      "The report highlights the Department of Defense's lackadaisical attitude towards human health risks by giving a green light to continued use of chaff while noting that several health questions remain unanswered," Grace Potorti, director of the Reno-based Rural Alliance for Military Accountability, said Tuesday.
      "Until we have an independent, impartial study of the health effects of chaff, the military should be allowed no additional public land over which to drop chaff," she said. "The studies must either confirm or nullify risks to humans and the environment."
      Made of fiberglass-covered aluminum thinner than a human hair, chaff is ejected from military aircraft to confuse enemy radar.
      In Nevada, Fallon Naval Air Station and Nellis Air Force Base have used chaff in training missions for decades. Military officials have said the material is essential for realistic training and presents no health risks to the public or animals.
      The Air Force plans to expand the use of chaff during pilot training over public and private lands in eastern Nevada and western Utah. Under the Air Force plan, large bundles of the material would be released at lower altitudes and over public and private lands within the Utah Test and Training Range, which extends into Nevada.
      A 1998 report from the General Accounting Office found that the health effects of chaff on humans and animals is unknown.
      The Navy report was in response to the GAO study. Navy researchers found that the "environmental, human and animal impacts of chaff are negligible, and far less than those from other manmade emissions."
      Critics said the Navy's study is biased.
      "The health risks and ecological damage associated with inhalation, ingestion and widespread dispersal of chaff has never been independently researched," said Steve Erickson, spokesman for the Downwinders, a military watchdog group.
      "We cannot allow rural residents of Utah and Nevada to become guinea pigs for the Department of Defense."
      The coalition this week asked Reid to back an independent study of chaff's effects on the environment.


E-mail this story to a friend:
Your friend's e-mail address:

Your e-mail address:


Give us your FEEDBACK on this or any story.

BEST OF LAS VEGAS

Fill out our Online Readers' Poll
Printable version of this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[News] [Sports] [Business] [Lifestyles] [Neon] [Opinion] [in-depth]
[Columnists] [Help/About] [Archive] [Community Link] [Current Edition]
[Classifieds] [Real Estate] [TV] [Weather]
[EMAIL] [SEARCH] [HOME]
Brought to you by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.   Nevada's largest daily newspaper.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]