EDITORIAL: Pension ruling

For years, taxpayers in flat-broke municipalities have been faced with a crushing burden: No matter how far they and their governments fell, they’d still be on the hook for every dime of promised pension benefits to current and retired public-sector workers.

Not anymore.

In deciding Tuesday that Detroit could move forward with its historic Chapter 9 filing, Judge Steven W. Rhodes declared that pension benefits “are not entitled to any heightened protection in a municipal bankruptcy.” The ruling, like the Detroit bankruptcy itself, breaks new ground.

Bankruptcy is for entities that have no chance of ever repaying all their debts and desperately need to start over. But it’s impossible for governments to reboot if huge obligations are bulletproof. Considering states and local governments have trillions of dollars in unfunded pension liabilities, this ruling is long overdue.

The idea that taxpayers should absorb all the hurt when their elected officials make financial promises that can’t possibly be kept is outrageous — and a judge agrees. The Detroit case is now a warning signal to public-sector unions and their elected sponsors: Start making difficult decisions now or face painful consequences later.


Rules for posting comments

Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum. Read our guidelines for posting. If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon next to the comment.


Due to an increase in uncivil behavior and dialogue the Review-Journal has temporarily disabled the comment boards. The Review-Journal will use the time to evaluate the effectiveness of the comment boards and find an appropriate time to reintroduce them to reviewjournal.com.