91°F
weather icon Clear

Why so few Hispanics in the government work-force?

When President Obama leaves office in January, his legacy — in many Hispanics’ minds, at least — will largely be defined by his record number of deportations.

Hopefully, history will also remember that Obama has done an admirable job of putting Hispanics into visible positions in both his administration and in other top government posts.

He currently has four Cabinet or Cabinet-level Latino office-holders — Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro, Education Secretary John King, and Small Business Administrator Maria Contreras-Sweet — out of a total of 23 such positions.

Amazingly, at 17 percent, the number of the president’s Latino executive department heads accurately reflects the percentage of Hispanics in the U.S. population. Kenneth Romero-Cruz, executive director of the National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators (NHCSL), an organization representing Hispanic state legislators, wants to keep it that way. His group has vowed to act as a watchdog on the next president’s administration to ensure that Latinos lose no ground.

Romero-Cruz underscored how important it is that top government positions reflect the nation’s demographics — so that institutions can be responsive to the needs of particular communities — not simply for the sake of fulfilling a quota. But in the federal work-force as a whole, the picture is much different. By NHCSL’s count, Latinos are the most underrepresented minority in the federal work-force.

“Even now, though we are 17.6 percent of the U.S. population, we are just 8.4 of the federal work-force,” Romero-Cruz said. “The Office of Personnel Management issued its first diversity and inclusion report in 2002 and Latino underrepresentation was seen as chronic even back then. But if you take the percentage of Latinos in the federal work-force then, in the context of their smaller population in the U.S., and compare it to now, we’ve seen less than a 2 percent increase in over a decade.”

By his estimate, if this continues at the same rate, it will take close to 60 years for Hispanic federal employees to match the proportion of their population. This is troubling. And another thing to consider is that this is more than a numbers game.

It is symbolically important to have Hispanics in roles that have, effectively, nothing to do with being Latino because for most Hispanics — a majority of whom are U.S.-born — their identities and life goals are not defined exclusively by where their parents came from.

It’s a distinction that might not be obvious to people who aren’t underrepresented in their professions: well-educated, highly qualified experts who just happen to be minorities don’t strive to do their jobs just for those who share their race or ethnicity. They want to serve everyone.

Sure, it makes sense that the Small Business Administration, Education and Housing and Urban Development are led by experts who resemble the largest constituencies of their departments. For instance, according to Stanford University, the number of Latino-owned business grew by 46.9 percent between 2007 and 2012, compared with just 0.7 percent for non-Latino owned businesses.

But it would be extra thrilling to see, for instance, a Hispanic female treasury secretary or a Latino secretary of defense. Same thing for a Hispanic head of state or commerce because, unfortunately, when many people think of Hispanics, they conjure up images of lawn maintenance workers and maids, not of finance executives or military experts. We need to flip these scripts.

First things first, however. Romero-Cruz says the top Latinos we do have are breaking important ceilings for others. “A decade from now we will hopefully see more internship opportunities, more pipeline development from these barrier-breakers who will be looking for new talent to come up behind them.”

For now, there’s only hope that the two presidential candidates — who openly boast about how close to or popular they are with Hispanics — will actually prove it when they form their administrations.

Esther Cepeda’s email address is estherjcepeda@washpost.com. Follow her on Twitter, @estherjcepeda.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.