69°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

Loss of ‘net neutrality’ means problems for the internet

Most people have no idea what “net neutrality” means, but will miss it very, very much when it is gone. Think about it this way: Whoever controls the information you receive over the internet decides what information you get and don’t get and how fast or slow you get it.

A few examples of places where the information you get over the internet is highly controlled would be North Korea, China, Russia, Iran and a few of the Arab countries.

Net neutrality means you get all your information at the same speed. The internet providers can’t provide one information source at a very, very slow speed and another at the highest speed simply because one source is paying more money for the faster speed.

When you watch TV, all the channels are provided to you at the same time. You could watch any news channel. It is a neutral playing field. With the internet we must rely on getting our information from a variety of sources. Without net-neutrality the source we want to see could be slowed down to a trickle or blocked altogether — and a source we don’t trust could be running 24/7 at high speed.

If you have any worries about fake news, you should be concerned. Without net neutrality, you could get more of it from unreliable sources. When you control the information source, you control everything people believe to be true and factual.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Billionaires and broadband infrastructure

Your editorial about Donald Trump’s broadband bill, part of his Investment and Jobs Act, ignores important information.

LETTER: Trump administration fantasies about Jan. 6 attacks

Trump and the convicted rioters should be sitting in a federal prison in orange jumpsuits. But, unfortunately, he was re-elected and now the country and the world have to suffer his revenge, wrath and dictatorial bent.

RICH LOWRY: Yes, we need a $1.5 trillion defense budget

The United States needs to make sure that it is not over-investing in the weapons systems of the past, although a defense budget on the scale that Trump is discussing would relieve some pressure from these choices.

LETTER: It’s all about the oil

Trump is against “regime change” — until he isn’t.

LETTER: Woe, thy name is Raider fan

I hope Pete Carroll ends up with a team that respects him and gives him all of the parts needed to be successful.

LETTER: In the streets, for and against Maduro

Can someone explain to me why, with the capture of Nicolas Maduro, the people in Venezuela are celebrating while the people in America are protesting and demanding his release?

LETTER: On Maduro and Putin

Does the United States have leverage?

MORE STORIES