43°F
weather icon Clear

The border wall debate

Victor Joecks is right about walls being a deterrent (Friday column). But they aren’t a barrier. As seen by the examples offered in his column, people need armed guards in addition to walls. So after we spend tax money to build the wall, what then?

A determined person will use ladders and tunnels. There are electronic devices to monitor this wall, but what do they cost? How many guards will we hire to police the border? Then, after raising taxes to pay for all this, what about the people flying in or coming by boat? How much of a problem is illegal entry into the United States anyway, and do we want to pay more taxes to try to stop it?

The wall is a political gesture, not a practical solution. The $5 billion could be spent more wisely elsewhere.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Creating a permission structure for hate

The proposed Nevada constitutional amendment on transgender athletes isn’t solving a problem, it’s creating a permission structure for hate.

LETTER: The ICE shooting

Why would we think the feds should be in complete control of this?

LETTER: Billionaires and broadband infrastructure

Your editorial about Donald Trump’s broadband bill, part of his Investment and Jobs Act, ignores important information.

LETTER: Trump administration fantasies about Jan. 6 attacks

Trump and the convicted rioters should be sitting in a federal prison in orange jumpsuits. But, unfortunately, he was re-elected and now the country and the world have to suffer his revenge, wrath and dictatorial bent.

RICH LOWRY: Yes, we need a $1.5 trillion defense budget

The United States needs to make sure that it is not over-investing in the weapons systems of the past, although a defense budget on the scale that Trump is discussing would relieve some pressure from these choices.

MORE STORIES