48°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

More details on the green energy debate

Updated May 2, 2019 - 11:22 pm

I have speculated that some members of the anti-green energy crowd have a problem connecting dots. John Stossel confirmed my suspicions in his April 29 commentary “Day dreaming about the Green New Deal.”

Totally ignored were energy storage technologies such as pumped storage hydroelectric, compressed air, flywheel, non-battery chemical and various thermal methods. The solar plant at Tonopah employs a molten sodium/potassium nitrate mixture to store excess solar thermal energy.

With regard to battery storage of solar energy, Mr. Stossel notes the various expenses to make batteries. However, nowhere does he mention using solar energy to recharge existing batteries. Further, I cannot grasped how, after citing the safety of nuclear energy, he could ignore the hazards of nuclear waste disposal while suggesting the hazards related to battery disposal argue against using batteries to store solar energy.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Sprawl is bad

Las Vegas needs to think long term.

LETTER: Too many orange cones

Our local politicians need to rethink their obsession with destroying major roadways.

LETTER: Cops put their lives on the line to protect and serve

I was taught from a young age that respect for those in law enforcement was expected, and that if you were ever in a situation where an officer gave you an order, you followed it … period.

LETTER: Blame Nevada voters for high power costs

Your statement that, “Nevada consumers who are upset at high utility costs should direct their ire to state policy makers” is way off the mark.

LETTER: Local BLM land sales?

Land could be free for first-time home buyers.

LETTER: Rain, rain go away

Homeowners should be careful not to water when wet weather comes to the valley.

MORE STORIES