66°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Let’s promote understanding when it comes to the transgender

In response to Victor Joecks’ Wednesday column:

There is no “transgender movement.” There are transgender people, real human beings who do not fit into the idealized world of boy-girl-and-nothing-else. And the existence of transgendered people is not new. Albert Cashier fought as a man in the Union army. But later, when he became ill, it was revealed that he was born Jennie Hodgers.

The “bathroom issue” is not an issue. If you have used a restroom at a movie, a play or at a sporting event, you have shared a bathroom with a transgendered person and you survived. In fact, when you look at another person, you do not see genitalia, you see gender expression and usually make up your mind about whether you are looking at a male or a female based upon that expression.

The transition is not quixotic or quick for those who change their gender expression. Adults can defend the change themselves, but children who are confused about their “gender” need the same love and understanding that any child needs.

It is not an easy topic. Calling it a “war on women” or a “political trend” does not promote understanding, and it does not help anyone.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Creating a permission structure for hate

The proposed Nevada constitutional amendment on transgender athletes isn’t solving a problem, it’s creating a permission structure for hate.

LETTER: The ICE shooting

Why would we think the feds should be in complete control of this?

LETTER: Billionaires and broadband infrastructure

Your editorial about Donald Trump’s broadband bill, part of his Investment and Jobs Act, ignores important information.

LETTER: Trump administration fantasies about Jan. 6 attacks

Trump and the convicted rioters should be sitting in a federal prison in orange jumpsuits. But, unfortunately, he was re-elected and now the country and the world have to suffer his revenge, wrath and dictatorial bent.

RICH LOWRY: Yes, we need a $1.5 trillion defense budget

The United States needs to make sure that it is not over-investing in the weapons systems of the past, although a defense budget on the scale that Trump is discussing would relieve some pressure from these choices.

LETTER: It’s all about the oil

Trump is against “regime change” — until he isn’t.

LETTER: Woe, thy name is Raider fan

I hope Pete Carroll ends up with a team that respects him and gives him all of the parts needed to be successful.

MORE STORIES