44°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Protecting children

I am once again appalled at reading the story of yet another child sacrificed by Child Protective Services (“A Recipe for Disaster,” Sunday). It’s hard to think of it in any other way when looking at the numerous times CPS failed to intervene before little Aaron Jones lost his life. I was struck by one phrase in the article, a quote from the county spokesman who said, “The county’s goal is to keep families together whenever possible.”

I have heard that before, ad nauseam, by government bureaucrats. Shouldn’t the goal of “Child Protective Services” to be to keep children alive and healthy? It seems that, like the public education system, every government program is geared to protect the rights of adults rather than the rights of the most vulnerable (parents vs. children, teachers vs. children). Even the hearing master blamed “state law” for giving this boy to his father, a convicted child abuser. Apparently, even a judge passes the buck when it’s uncomfortable.

For the sake of humanity, can’t we shift the focus of our laws and institutions to taking care of children? They’re the only ones involved in these cases who have no choices and cannot protect themselves.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Creating a permission structure for hate

The proposed Nevada constitutional amendment on transgender athletes isn’t solving a problem, it’s creating a permission structure for hate.

LETTER: The ICE shooting

Why would we think the feds should be in complete control of this?

LETTER: Billionaires and broadband infrastructure

Your editorial about Donald Trump’s broadband bill, part of his Investment and Jobs Act, ignores important information.

LETTER: Trump administration fantasies about Jan. 6 attacks

Trump and the convicted rioters should be sitting in a federal prison in orange jumpsuits. But, unfortunately, he was re-elected and now the country and the world have to suffer his revenge, wrath and dictatorial bent.

RICH LOWRY: Yes, we need a $1.5 trillion defense budget

The United States needs to make sure that it is not over-investing in the weapons systems of the past, although a defense budget on the scale that Trump is discussing would relieve some pressure from these choices.

LETTER: It’s all about the oil

Trump is against “regime change” — until he isn’t.

LETTER: Woe, thy name is Raider fan

I hope Pete Carroll ends up with a team that respects him and gives him all of the parts needed to be successful.

MORE STORIES