96°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

LETTER: The debate over what constitutes “infrastructure”

As President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party push a multitrillion-dollar taxpayer-funded infrastructure bill, the two parties can’t agree on what is and isn’t infrastructure. The Republicans have a conventional definition — roads, bridges, tunnels, air and seaports, pipelines and other physical assets. Democrats have a more expansive view — everything the Republicans want plus everything else imaginable: energy grids, health care, social welfare, government assistance, undocumented immigrants, wifi and more.

If the two parties can’t agree on the basics, the bill is doomed before it begins. Here’s my suggestion for common ground: Depreciation. If it can be depreciated, then it’s infrastructure.

Maybe, that’s the solution to political agreement. Worth trying.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: The days of bargain Vegas are over

Elimination of the “value” traveler to Southern Nevada is the next planned step in the evolution of the Las Vegas experience.

LETTER: E-bike and scooter riders can be a local menace

It is only a matter of time before a driver runs over one of the near-invisible e-motorists. And nobody wants to be that driver when such a simple solution exists.

LETTER: A nation of laws

County, school district should not obstruct immigration enforcement.

LETTER: The art of the kneel

I don’t know what was worse at the Alaska summit, an American president being humiliated by a former KGB agent or the press coverage.

MORE STORIES