44°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Those deceptive ads about Question 3

I read with dismay the Review-Journal’s recent editorial on Question 3. I had no idea that Question 3 actually represented “ranked-choice” voting. The TV ads sure put a different spin on it, talking only about open primaries. I think there should have been advertising to refute those ads and explain the real damage that would be done if Question 3 passes.

I don’t think the measure would win the popular vote if people really understood what it was all about. As it stands, I’m afraid the friendly, clean-cut people on television touting the benefit of voting “yes” will have no trouble winning the battle.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Creating a permission structure for hate

The proposed Nevada constitutional amendment on transgender athletes isn’t solving a problem, it’s creating a permission structure for hate.

LETTER: The ICE shooting

Why would we think the feds should be in complete control of this?

LETTER: Billionaires and broadband infrastructure

Your editorial about Donald Trump’s broadband bill, part of his Investment and Jobs Act, ignores important information.

LETTER: Trump administration fantasies about Jan. 6 attacks

Trump and the convicted rioters should be sitting in a federal prison in orange jumpsuits. But, unfortunately, he was re-elected and now the country and the world have to suffer his revenge, wrath and dictatorial bent.

RICH LOWRY: Yes, we need a $1.5 trillion defense budget

The United States needs to make sure that it is not over-investing in the weapons systems of the past, although a defense budget on the scale that Trump is discussing would relieve some pressure from these choices.

MORE STORIES