49°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: Sprawl is bad

In response to Kent Davidson’s recent letter, “Sitting around,” which discusses the need for the federal government to release more land for development to lower housing costs. Picture solid suburban development up to the lodge at Mount Charleston, Pahrump and the California border. Sprawl is a short-term solution but creates long-term issues with sprawling infrastructure maintenance.

Costs to support sprawl increase exponentially, while developers make profits and leave. Look at the issues in California from decades of sprawl. I see plenty of areas within the valley’s boundaries for development. We need to stop thinking short term. Covering the desert with cheap dwellings is a ticket to disaster.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Too many orange cones

Our local politicians need to rethink their obsession with destroying major roadways.

LETTER: Cops put their lives on the line to protect and serve

I was taught from a young age that respect for those in law enforcement was expected, and that if you were ever in a situation where an officer gave you an order, you followed it … period.

LETTER: Blame Nevada voters for high power costs

Your statement that, “Nevada consumers who are upset at high utility costs should direct their ire to state policy makers” is way off the mark.

LETTER: Local BLM land sales?

Land could be free for first-time home buyers.

MORE STORIES