92°F
weather icon Clear

Collective bargaining ensures additional education spending just goes to the unions

School spending

In response to your Dec. 25 story, “School funding suit all but certain”:

Funding for education in Nevada has been increased many times. School bonds have been issued even when the voters have had no say. The taxpayers are tired of the crying. The Clark County School District cannot account for millions of dollars.

Even if lawsuits were filed against the taxpayers, any additional money would go only to increases in salaries and other benefits for employees. Why? The Nevada Revised Statutes require all local school officials to bargain with the various unions for pay and benefits. If an agreement cannot be reached, the decision will be left to an arbitrator. He or she would make the decision and it would be based on money within the system. The arbitrator will always see that there is money to pay.

If a court ordered another $1 trillion to be spent in Nevada, the arbitrator would see it and take it. That is why more money will go nowhere but into people’s pockets. Until the Legislature changes the law, nothing will change.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: We need clean energy — and fast

In his May 21 column, Victor Joecks wrote that we should “stop stressing out about climate change.” On June 3, the Review-Journal featured a story about a survey by UNLV which found that heat is a hot topic.

LETTER: Tinkering with mail-in voting

I agree it’s reasonable to call for tighter oversight of mail-in ballot counting (June 6 Review-Journal editorial), but such scrutiny must apply across the board, not just in select areas.

LETTER: Another sad Nevada animal cruelty story

We are grateful for the passage of “Reba’s Law” recently at the Nevada Legislature, but heavier fines and penalties are necessary.

MORE STORIES