76°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: Elections, state legislatures and the courts

The U.S. Supreme Court heard a case on Wednesday in which it was argued that state supreme courts have no function in issues involving state elections of federal officeholders, i.e. senators, House members and the president. If the high court opines that this is correct, it means that no state supreme court may rule on such issues as it regards its state constitution. This is wrong.

Our state governments mirror our federal government, which is made up of three branches - executive, legislative and judicial. Each of these parts provides checks and balances. It is the judicial branch, in the form of the Supreme Court, that decides if any action taken by the other two branches is not in accordance with the Constitution.

It is clear that this issue has been brought to the Supreme Court by those who were upset when their state courts denied legislatures the ability to step into state election procedures for partisan reasons. For the Supreme Court to show any sympathy for this position would be to restructure all state governments for those same political reasons.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: High-speed rail boondoggle

This seems to me as good a reason as any to cancel this boondoggle.

LETTER: Parsing the NV Energy bill

Although our illustrious leaders (tongue in cheek) believe that breaking everything down into little categories keeps us from knowing how they nickel-and-dime us to death, it doesn’t elude us.

LETTER: Economics and the stock market

Hundreds of billions have been raised to fund AI and other associated businesses. It is far too early to determine the economic impact.

LETTER: Patton and Hegseth, a comparison

in 2025, Pete Hegseth is criticized for pushing for newly proposed military fitness standards.

MORE STORIES