90°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Nevada doesn’t need to be the nation’s dumping ground

Updated May 23, 2019 - 12:45 am

Two recent letter writers — John Currell of Henderson and Paul Rodriguez of Las Vegas — promoted Nevada to be the recipient of toxic nuclear waste.

Mr. Currell states, “Accepting the waste would benefit many Americans.” He alludes to payments being made to Nevada by the federal government. Mr. Rodriguez is more up front when he states Nevada should “demand a nice large fee for storing other states’ nuclear waste.” Their logic is based on the premise of giving up something for money. That logic appeals to certain elements of society today.

Prostitution is a lot like that. Those who promote making Nevada a nuclear dump are not dissimilar to those who promote prostitution.

But I take exception to anyone who wants to prostitute Nevada and dump toxic nuclear waste here. I agree with Mr. Rodriguez when he states that states which produced it “can store it themselves.”

Leave the toxic waste where it is, and let those who make it generate all that federal money for themselves. We’ll all be happier, and Nevada will be cleaner.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Staffing bill aims at the wrong target

Critically needed temps help Nevada industries.

LETTER: All burned up

There might be another reason Georgia burns less than California.

LETTER: Lawyer joke

Attorney sues Las Vegas Valley Water District over conservation efforts.

LETTER: The transportation bureaucracy

The U.S. Department of Transportation grant to study the alternatives to improving public transit on Charleston means we will spend $5.9 million of before Charleston ever sees an orange cone. Wow.

LETTER: The dangers in school zones

I’ve lived in Southern Nevada since 1996, and school zones are invisible to many drivers. It seems that the casual attitude of local officials hasn’t helped much.

MORE STORIES