79°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

LETTER: Perhaps it’s time for the filibuster to go

In response to your Monday editorial on Democrats “killing the filibuster”:

Labeling any Democratic proposal as “radical” is misleading and divisive and sets up readers to dismiss it out of hand. There are reasonable arguments for maintaining or dismissing the filibuster. The issue I have is that the editorial makes no mention of the tactic’s use to obstruct civil rights legislation, a practice that continued until 1965 when LBJ garnered enough votes to break the filibuster.

In recent years, Mitch McConnell has employed it to obstruct every Democratic proposal in order to argue the Democrats couldn’t get anything done. His insistence on keeping the filibuster for two years, until the mid-term elections, is so he can again say the Democrats couldn’t accomplish anything and GOP control of the Senate is needed to move the country forward.

Maybe the filibuster needs to be retired.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Vegas is blowing it

When people feel ripped off, they stay away.

LETTER: The days of bargain Vegas are over

Elimination of the “value” traveler to Southern Nevada is the next planned step in the evolution of the Las Vegas experience.

LETTER: E-bike and scooter riders can be a local menace

It is only a matter of time before a driver runs over one of the near-invisible e-motorists. And nobody wants to be that driver when such a simple solution exists.

LETTER: A nation of laws

County, school district should not obstruct immigration enforcement.

MORE STORIES