47°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: The downside of price controls

In his Saturday letter, Jerry Sturdivant stated that there was no downside for those on Medicare to President Joe Biden’s “negotiated” fee with Big Pharma for insulin and other drugs.

The downside is that this negotiated fee was not agreed to by Big Pharma. It was dictated to them. The issue then is that while this seems like a good move for many of us seniors, the nonseniors not on Medicare have to pay the $160 billion dollars that the pharmacy companies are no longer getting. They don’t just take this loss and say, “Oh well.” They take the $160 billion and move that loss over to non-Medicare drugs where there are no price controls. This increases the cost for those drugs, which the insurance companies and those with insurance coverage through those companies must pay.

This is nothing more than a cost shift that those not on Medicare will pay. That is the downside.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: The graduation scam

Clark County School District numbers mean little.

LETTER: Holiday party pooper

Spin, exaggeration and political games from a Nevada congresswoman

LETTER: Free health care?

For low-income people, I agree with the concept of tax credits to help offset the cost of insurance premiums. However, I question the current eligibility requirement of four times the poverty level.

LETTER: Political folly on housing prices

These factors are why housing costs are a challenge. To expect the government to make housing affordable is a fool’s errand.

LETTER: A note to Mark Wahlberg

Let the film studios fund their own endeavors.

MORE STORIES