109°F
weather icon Windy

There are problems with the new bump stock directive

Nevada’s congressional Democrats criticized the rule banning bump stocks, preferring the president and Congress had passed a law instead (Wednesday Review-Journal). The rule takes effect in March, and bump stock owners have 90 days to surrender and/or destroy their devices. Gun-control groups lobbied for the rule, saying it should have happened sooner.

In 2010, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives approved the use of bump stocks, determining they didn’t meet the definition of machine guns. But it did an about-face after the October 2017 massacre killing 58 people in Las Vegas and recommended a rule to ban the devices.

But the rule is flawed for the following reasons: It doesn’t address law-abiding Americans who relied on the previous ATF determinations, and it is hard — if not impossible — to enforce because there’s no way to track down bump stocks and their owners.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Lawyer joke

Attorney sues Las Vegas Valley Water District over conservation efforts.

LETTER: The transportation bureaucracy

The U.S. Department of Transportation grant to study the alternatives to improving public transit on Charleston means we will spend $5.9 million of before Charleston ever sees an orange cone. Wow.

LETTER: The dangers in school zones

I’ve lived in Southern Nevada since 1996, and school zones are invisible to many drivers. It seems that the casual attitude of local officials hasn’t helped much.

LETTER: Make Las Vegas fun again

The issue is that the Las Vegas casinos are no longer fun. It certainly is time for another reinvention.

LETTER: Why the Canadians are staying home

I’m a Canadian who, like many others, has thoroughly enjoyed past visits to your state. For months, however, we have endured your president’s insults, his unprovoked trade war and his threats to Canada’s sovereignty.

MORE STORIES