Home Subscribe
Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo
.
Member Center

Recent Editions
FSSuMTWTh
>> Search the site
.
.
.
.
NEWS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Oct. 17, 2006
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal


HARRY REID: Senator's expenses questioned

Nevadan paid Christmas bonuses with campaign funds

By JOHN SOLOMON
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS




Land deeds show Sen. Harry Reid and his wife, Landra, purchased a condominium for their Washington residence at the Ritz-Carlton hotel, above, for $750,000 in March 2001.
Photos by The Associated Press.



Sen. Harry Reid announced he was amending his ethics reports to Congress to more fully account for a 2001 Las Vegas land transaction involving property at Patrick Lane and Fort Apache Road that drew attention to him last week when it was reported by The Associated Press.



Click image for enlargement.

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid has been using campaign funds instead of his personal money to pay Christmas bonuses for the support staff at the Ritz-Carlton, where he lives in an upscale condominium.

Federal election law bars candidates from converting political donations for personal use.

Advertisement



Questioned about the campaign expenditures, Reid's office said Monday the senator's lawyers had approved them, but he nonetheless was personally reimbursing his campaign for the $3,300 he had directed to the staff holiday fund at his residence.

"These donations were made to thank the men and women who work in the building for the extra work they do as a result of my political activities, and for helping the security officers assigned to me because of my Senate position," Reid said.

"I am reimbursing the campaign from my own pocket to prevent this issue from being used in the current campaign season to deflect attention from Republican failures," he said.

Reid also announced he was amending his ethics reports to Congress to more fully account for a 2001 Las Vegas land transaction that drew attention to him last week when it was reported by The Associated Press.

Reid also said he had failed to disclose two other transactions on his earlier ethics reports and would account for those on his amended reports as well.

The first, he said, involved the sale in 2004 of about one-third acre of land he owned in his hometown of Searchlight.

And he said he had not reported his ownership of a quarter-acre of land his brother gave him in 1985. Reid said the land appreciated "at some point in recent years" beyond the $1,000 threshold that triggered the reporting requirement.

Reid said the failure to disclose those transactions previously was attributable to "clerical errors," and they amounted to "two minor matters that were inadvertently left off my original disclosure forms."

Reid spokesman Jon Summers said details about both transactions were being gathered by staff and would be included in the amended reports.

In the matter reported last week, the senator hadn't disclosed to Congress that he first sold land to a friend's limited liability company in 2001 and took an ownership stake in the company. He collected the seven-figure payout when the company sold the land again in 2004 to others.

Reid portrayed the 2004 sale as a personal sale of land, not mentioning the company's ownership or its role in the sale.

Reid said his amended ethics reports would list the 2001 sale and the company, called Patrick Lane LLC. He said the amended reports also would divulge the two other smaller land deals he had failed to report to Congress.

"I directed my staff to file amended financial disclosure forms noting that in 2001, I transferred title to the land to a Limited Liability Corporation," Reid said in a statement issued by his office.

He said he believed the 2001 sale did not alter his ownership of the land but that he agreed to file the amended reports because "I believe in ensuring all facts come to light."

Reid labeled the AP story as the "latest attempt" by Republicans to affect the election. AP reported last week that it learned of the land deal from a former Reid adviser who had concerns about the way the deal was reported to Congress.

On the Ritz-Carlton holiday donations, Reid gave $600 in 2002, then $1,200 in 2004 and $1,500 in 2005 from his re-election campaign to an entity listed as the REC Employee Holiday Fund. His campaign listed the expenses as campaign "salary" for two of the years and as a "contribution" one year.

Reid's office said the listing as salary was a "clerical error" and that the use of campaign money for the residential fund was approved by his lawyers.

Residents and workers at the Ritz-Carlton said the fund's full name is the Residents Executive Committee Holiday Fund and that it collects money each year from the condominium residents to help provide Christmas gifts, bonuses and a party for the support staff.

Federal election law permits campaigns to provide "gifts of nominal value" but prohibits candidates from using political donations for personal expenses, such as mortgage, rent or utilities for "any part of any personal residence."

The law specifically defines prohibited personal use expenses as any "obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate's campaign or duties as a federal officeholder."

Land deeds show Reid and his wife, Landra, purchased a condominium for their Washington residence at the hotel for $750,000 in March 2001. The holiday fund has existed for years at the condo, workers said.

Larry Noble, the Federal Election Commission's former chief enforcement lawyer, said Reid's explanation is aimed at a "gray area" in the law by suggesting the donations were tied to his official Senate and political work.

"What makes this harder for the senator is that this is his personal residence, and this looks like an event that everybody else at the residence is taking out of their personal money as they're living there," Noble said.

In 2000, Congress rebuked powerful House Transportation Committee Chairman Bud Shuster, R-Pa., for among other things creating the appearance, through poor record-keeping, that campaign committee expenditures were for personal rather than bona fide campaign uses.

Reid had asked the Senate Ethics Committee on Wednesday for an opinion on the 2001 land sale but decided to amend his forms prior to the committee acting.

Reid's announcement came after numerous newspapers nationwide published editorials criticizing both his initial failure to disclose the full details of his Las Vegas land deal and his response to AP's story.

The $1.1 million land deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in earlier organized crime investigations. Brown has never been charged with wrongdoing, except for a 1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court.

Ethics experts said Reid's inaccurate accounting of the deal to Congress appeared to violate Senate ethics rules and raised other issues concerning taxes and potential gifts.

Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault contributed to this report.


Advertisement


Contact the R-J | Subscribe | Report a delivery problem | Put the paper on hold | Advertise with us
Report a news tip/press release | Send a letter to the editor | Print the announcement forms | Jobs at the R-J

Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal, 1997 -
Stephens Media   Privacy Statement