World Cup betting: Take a chance on the draw

Las Vegas Review-Journal sports writers Adam Hill and David Schoen have been given $5,000 fantasy bankrolls to bet during the World Cup on either sides, totals or props. Below are their bets for today, with an explanation of their picks:


Bankroll: $5,440

Thursday: Won $590

Today: Betting $100

Bet 1: $100 on Switzerland (+½, plus-110) over France

Comment: Switzerland has heard all the naysayers snickering about the fact it entered the tournament as a seeded team. There is a reason it got the spot, though. This is a disciplined side, particularly in the midfield. It has a lot to prove here and will find a way to avoid defeat. Both teams won their openers and would be happy picking up a point for the draw.


Bankroll: $4,915

Thursday: Won $0

Today: Betting $350

Bet 1: $200 on Italy (-½, plus-110) over Costa Rica, first half

Comment: This play goes against tournament form, as teams from the Americas have fared quite well. But Italy played well in its opener against England — its odds at the LVH to win the tournament are down to 15-1 — and won’t sit back early knowing a victory would put the Azzuri in prime position to finish top of the group.

Bet 2: $150 on France-Switzerland draw (plus-255)

Comment: These teams are familiar with each other, and neither side will have a home-field advantage, which has proven to be a major factor through the first week of the tournament. France wasn’t tested in its opener against 10-man Honduras, and the Swiss defense is tough to breach. Switzerland has allowed only two goals in its past eight World Cup matches.


Rules for posting comments

Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum. Read our guidelines for posting. If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon next to the comment.


Due to an increase in uncivil behavior and dialogue the Review-Journal has temporarily disabled the comment boards. The Review-Journal will use the time to evaluate the effectiveness of the comment boards and find an appropriate time to reintroduce them to