40°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: A tale of two fish

I didn’t realize Nevada fish were worth saving more than California fish.

On Page 10A of the Jan. 15 Review-Journal, an editorial criticized California, in part for not wanting to provide more water to its residents due to the harm it may cause various endangered species of fish.

Yet there on Page 1B in the same edition was a Review-Journal article stating that Nevada doesn’t want to provide more water in the Amargosa Valley for lithium mines due to the harm it may cause the Amargosa River pupfish.

It’s interesting how a state border can cause a 180-degree reversal in people’s opinions.

MOST READ
In case you missed it
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Life on the streets is tough in Las Vegas

The many heat-related deaths in Clark County can largely be linked to the business community and the local governments.

LETTER: A green energy bust

California energy ratepayers were promised that their bills would be cheaper over time but, not unsurprisingly, that did not come to fruition.

LETTER: Budget follies at the CCSD

Perhaps this is why many kids in our schools are not proficient in math.

MORE STORIES