57°F
weather icon Cloudy

LETTER: Impeachment coverage lacking in Thursday’s Review-Journal

For only the third time in the history of our country, Congress is holding an impeachment trial of a sitting U.S. president. Does that story merit a front page banner headline in the Thursday Review-Journal? Nope. In fact, there is no meaningful coverage of the trial on the front page. Nor on page 2. Nor on page 3. A full story about the trial does not appear until page 4.

The lower part of the page is entitled “Dems begin their case against Trump.” But, instead of giving any of the facts presented by the Democrats at the trial, any summary of why the House of Representatives voted to try to remove Trump from office, why they felt he committed high crimes and misdemeanors, the story focused on the political maneuvering surrounding the trial.

Do the editors think the reasons for the impeachment trial are unimportant? Do they think readers would not understand what was being presented? The absence of quality reporting on important topics in our daily newspaper leaves us ignorant and susceptible to the “fake news” readily available on social media. Your readers expect more of you. Your readers demand more of you.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Sonia Sotomayor, retirement and race

Using race to justify or condemn the action of others is simply wrong and, some would say, the definition of racism. We are all one people.

LETTER: Is there another Joe Biden out there?

Both the front-runner presidential candidates should step aside and give us some choices who are younger and have fresh ideas to get us out of the $35 trillion debt.

LETTER: Deciphering progressive jargon

I noticed recently that euphemisms are commonly used by progressives in order to make the agenda they support seem less harsh or unpleasant.