96°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

‘Outraged’ Gov. Sisolak puts task force on marijuana enforcement

Updated October 11, 2019 - 4:22 pm

CARSON CITY – An “outraged” Gov. Steve Sisolak announced immediate action Friday to tighten regulation and enforcement of Nevada’s legal marijuana industry – a move triggered by federal charges that foreign nationals sought to enter the lucrative industry by buying political influence.

In an early morning statement, the governor said he had formed a special task force involving multiple state agencies to “root out potential corruption or criminal influences in Nevada’s marijuana marketplace.”

“Any marijuana entity – licensed or unlicensed – that violates the law will see swift and severe criminal and regulatory action,” the statement read.

His office later declined to specify how the task force would operate or what agencies would be involved, citing a need to keep investigative and enforcement efforts confidential. It will investigate possible criminal behavior and regulatory misconduct and refer matters for criminal prosecution.

The task force will be “robust, real, significant and substantial, and will have power and authority to hold bad actors accountable,” said Sisolak’s chief of staff, Michelle White.

The governor, in his morning statement, cited endemic problems with the still-nascent but booming state pot industry, such as illegal sales to minors, alleged manipulation of product testing and lawsuits over the licensing process. His office had been weighing an expedited enforcement effort even before Thursday’s federal indictment against men charged with influence peddling in state elections.

One count of the federal indictment charged four men in a scheme to enter the state’s marijuana industry with $1 million provided by an unnamed Russia businessman and hiding the foreign investor’s involvement due to his “Russian roots and current political paranoia about it.” One of the men made maximum contributions of $10,000 each to Republican candidates for governor and attorney general in what the indictment charged was an illegal effort by foreign interests to influence a state election. Foreign giving or concealing contributions behind “straw” donors are violations of federal campaign law.

The broader indictment charged additional campaign finance law violations. Two of the men charged worked with President Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph Giuliani on efforts to gin up damaging information against the president’s political rivals, primarily former Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, over past dealings with the government of Ukraine.

In the Nevada case, the indictment charges that the men knew they had missed a September 2018 deadline to apply for a business license “unless we change the rules” by electing a candidate to state office who might “green light” their effort.

A week later, one of the men charged in the indictment made donations to Adam Laxalt and Wes Duncan, the respective 2018 GOP candidates for governor and attorney general, with funds from the Russian investor. Campaigns for both candidates said Thursday they would return the donations.

Sisolak defeated Laxalt in 2018. One of his first acts as governor was to call for a Cannabis Compliance Board that was subsequently created under a bill approved last spring by the Legislature.

The governor’s statement said Friday the new task force would undertake some of the actions the compliance board was created to address. He cited a lack of industry oversight and “inaction from the state over many years,” including the lack of any criminal referral to date by the Marijuana Enforcement Division since legal marijuana sales began.

The compliance board, when fully up and running, will subsume the task force’s duties.

Contact Bill Dentzer at bdentzer@reviewjournal.com or 775-461-0661. Follow @DentzerNews on Twitter.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Petitions can be withdrawn before vote, Nevada AG says

The Nevada Constitution doesn’t prohibit people who circulate petitions to create or change laws from withdrawing those measures after they qualify for the ballot but before they go to voters, according to an opinion from the attorney general’s office.