63°F
weather icon Clear

LETTER: Consider higher housing costs an ‘investment’

The assertion that complying with government regulations adds 23.8 percent to the cost of the average house is a serious misunderstanding of economics when the cost of environmental degradation isn’t accounted for (“Biden’s climate change policy is making housing less affordable,” April 19 e-commentary). Focusing on the cost of energy-efficient building regulations without acknowledging the financial impacts of climate change is short-sighted.

The long-term payoff of energy efficiency standards in construction will not just be in lower energy costs, it will also be in helping to achieve a livable climate. What’s the real price tag of an “affordable” house that’s more vulnerable to devastating storms, floods, heat, wildfires and droughts intensified by a warming climate? Cutting corners today will result in inflated expenses tomorrow as we battle increasing climate emergencies. That’s not affordable for anyone. The cost of inaction is too high.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Donald Trump and the kangaroo courts

The objective is to show that Mr. Trump is not a nice person, and with biased judges and juries, the verdicts are already determined.

LETTER: ID needed to pick up hair spray

I cannot comprehend why identification is not required to vote in Nevada, yet it is required to pick up hair spray.