71°F
weather icon Mostly Cloudy

Why do the Bundys have to pay to graze cattle on federal land?

Maybe it’s true that I’m getting old and brain cells are dying off, but I would like to pose this one simple question: Why should the Bundy family have to pay the Bureau of Land Management fees to graze their cattle on federal land in Nevada? It would seem to me that the federal government should pay the Bundy family. After all, we have a nation to feed and even the feds eat beef.

This saga about grazing rights goes all the way back to the old range wars. An armed standoff and anti-American rhetoric was a poor approach to the situation, but it would have been avoidable from the very start had the range been open to grazing without a fee. Existing tax laws are enough, and grazing fees amount to double taxation.

The situation smells a lot like an ongoing soap opera that will never end until grazing fees are negated and the land is used for a good purpose without federal intervention.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: High-speed rail boondoggle

This seems to me as good a reason as any to cancel this boondoggle.

LETTER: Parsing the NV Energy bill

Although our illustrious leaders (tongue in cheek) believe that breaking everything down into little categories keeps us from knowing how they nickel-and-dime us to death, it doesn’t elude us.

LETTER: Economics and the stock market

Hundreds of billions have been raised to fund AI and other associated businesses. It is far too early to determine the economic impact.

LETTER: Patton and Hegseth, a comparison

in 2025, Pete Hegseth is criticized for pushing for newly proposed military fitness standards.

MORE STORIES