103°F
weather icon Clear

Makes sense HOA should follow dog breed laws

Q: I know of Nevada Revised Statute 202.500. In short:

6. A local authority shall not adopt or enforce an ordinance or regulation that deems a dog dangerous or vicious based solely on the breed of the dog.

7. This section does not apply to a dog used by a law enforcement officer in the performance of his or her duty.

8. As used in this section, “local authority” means the governing board of a county, city or other political subdivision having authority to enact laws or ordinances or promulgate regulations relating to dogs.

Would this be useful in fighting a board who wants to enact a new rule restricting breeds, or is “local authority” very specific and does not include homeowners association boards?

Are you aware of any HOAs that have enacted rules after this 2013 law went into effect?

A: You are correct that the law does not specifically require associations to comply with this state law, but it certainly makes sense to try to convince an association board to modify their regulations because of the law.

Please note, that for some associations the prohibition of certain dogs, such as pit bulls, are found in their covenants, conditions and restrictions, which would require a vote of the membership to amend this section of their governing documents.

Q: Is there a statute that limits the amount monthly association dues can be increased in a fiscal year by the HOA board of directors without a vote by the homeowners?

A: NRS 116 does not dictate the assessment amount, nor does it dictate the limit that assessments can be increased by an association without homeowner vote. You would have to review your governing documents, generally the CC&Rs, as to the increase that a board can make without homeowner approval. What the law requires is that there is a budget ratification meeting by the homeowners.

Q: I live in a community with two associations, a master and a sub. There was a violation back on May, 2016, where the sub and the master both sent me courtesy notices and then fined me. The master letters included pictures but the sub did not. By then I was not aware that I had been receiving a letter from each association, separate regarding the same issue. I did cure the violation and notified the master and the violation was closed, however, the sub continued to fine me for four months after the violation was corrected.

My question is, isn’t a photograph one of the requirements before the association can fine the homeowner? I was reading the NRS 116, but it is a littler confusing.

A: NRS 116.31031 (1-c-3) states that an association when sending a written notice to cure an alleged violation that a clear and detailed photograph of the violation must be included with the notice. (Whenever possible as there are different violations such as noise disturbances that would not require a photograph). Technically, the association would not be able to fine the homeowner without a photograph or a hearing.

You need to send the sub-association the documentation that was sent to the master association and any correspondence from the master association acknowledging the violation has been cured with a request that the sub association removes any excessive fines after the date of correction of the violation.

Barbara Holland is a certified property manager, broker and supervisory certified association manager. Questions may be sent to holland744o@gmail.com.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
3 can make a quorum for HOA board

Let’s assume that you have a full board of five directors and at a duly noticed board meeting only three directors can attend.

Changes in law will affect how associations can tow vehicles

Senate Bill 212 was changed. It affects how associations can tow vehicles in the community. The existing law states that a vehicle may not be towed until 48 hours after affixing a notice to the vehicle that explains when it will be towed (with the exception of vehicles that are related to health, safety or welfare, i.e. parking in front of fire hydrants, etc.).

RESALE HOME SALES May 29-June 3

Editor’s note: Listings include the resale home’s parcel number. The address listed is the homebuyer’s mailing address and not the actual location of the resale home. About 90 percent of these addresses reflect the home purchase. Check the parcel number to make sure. Also, a few transactions do not reflect the market value of the homes. The information is provided by Accudata, a local research firm. For the complete listing, visit RJRealEstate.Vegas.

New Nevada laws that will affect HOAs

There were not too many laws passed in this last legislative session that affected our local homeowners associations. Here are some that did.

BHHS partners with Adwerx to offer Realtors new program

Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Nevada Properties, in partnership with Adwerx Enterprises, has launched a new platform, called Brilliantly Simple to immediately advertise its real estate listings online. The platform automatically creates digital advertising programs for each home, including custom ads that are optimized for social media, apps and websites.

Homeowners have right to see HOA financial records

Per Nevada Revised Statute 116.31175 (1a), upon written request, you are entitled to receive financial statements from your association. Please send a formal specific request of what financial statements that you would like to receive.

High land costs affect developments

For all the job growth and expansion in the Las Vegas economy, a lack of land and its high cost is restricting growth in the valley, experts told the Southern Nevada real estate and development community.

Local home prices stuck at $300,000

For the third straight month, the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors, GLVAR, reported that local home prices are hovering at $300,000, while the number of homes on the market continues to increase.

Fair Housing Law requires accommodations for disabled

The Fair Housing Law requires accommodations for the disabled. Based upon your email, the homeowner would have a strong claim against the association if the homeowner was forced to remove the motor home, or if the association were to fine the homeowner because of the therapy equipment. Take the time to meet with this homeowner and see if there are any other viable alternatives.