79°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

New Jersey’s press experiment deserves a chance

I would like to offer another perspective on your July 21 editorial about the New Jersey Legislature paying for journalistic initiatives and civic information. Your editorial was rightly concerned with letting the camel’s nose under the tent. Government and journalists should keep an arm’s-length relationship. Government officials who pay for journalism might assume they have control over what is reported.

In my role as a columnist for a national magazine (Editor & Publisher), I have reviewed this New Jersey initiative and interviewed the key proponents. I concluded that the fears of contamination — while understandable — should be placed on hold while this initiative plays out.

To begin with, the money did not come directly from taxpayers but from the state’s decision to sell its public television licenses for $322 million. Rather than pour all that money back into the general fund, the Legislature decided to put $20 million a year for five years into a fund to pay for these programs.

The Free Press Action Fund believes this would add local news and increase citizen interaction with government. Local newspapers could compete for these funds (so could tech companies and citizen groups) to support ideas that embellish local citizens’ knowledge of their government and community. Dozens of ideas outside the daily journalism model could flourish: legislative bill trackers; campaign donation reports that tie money to the legislator who sponsors a bill; local water quality tests made available immediately. It is not “just” paying for traditional journalism.

One of the key safeguards is a 13-member governing board that would decide on the grants. Four of the 13 are political appointees. The others are educators, local citizens, media representatives and people from tech companies.

The Free Press Action Fund is exciting and innovative. It is the kind of thinking our country needs as we figure out the future of journalism. I thank you for your editorial, and I know we all will be watching this experiment.

MOST READ
Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: We were already fooled once

Kamala Harris’ history tells us she is even more of a left-wing liberal than Joe Biden.

LETTER: Time to address lithium battery fires

Electric vehicles are transporting these lithium-ion batteries every time they go somewhere. Let’s limit their charge to 30 percent, just to be safe.

LETTER: Free speech shouldn’t apply to Trump

We Americans have a free speech law problem. Free speech should never apply when it is trying to accomplish doing away with our democracy.

LETTER: Get the national anthem right

Persons selected to sing the “Star Spangled Banner” in public should be vetted.

LETTER: Harris’ inflation promises fall flat

I wonder why she and the administration haven’t done anything in the past 3½ years to help the small-business owners during that time.

LETTER: Trump’s incoherence on full display

I watched Donald Trump’s response to a question on how he would make child care affordable. You did your readers a disservice by misrepresenting the exchange as normal.

LETTER: The NFL is pricing out its fans

I am an avid NFL football fan, and I am really angry at that league and what it has become.

MORE STORIES