I’m in confusion and dismay after reading Jacqueline Robins’ Friday letter to the editor. Are we residing in the same country?
Search results for:
Supporting the confirmation of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee while he refuses to commit to peacefully transferring power if he loses the election is no better than supporting a coup.
Steve Sebelius’s Sunday commentary on the Supreme Court displays a selective memory when it comes to understanding the Constitution and history.
Question 3 would make a series of changes to the State Board of Pardons Commissioners.
Question 6 would mandate that Nevada generate 50 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2030.
Question 4 would place a declaration of voters’ rights into the constitution.
Question 2 would recognize all marriages, regardless of gender, overturning the traditional definition of marriage in the state constitution.
Question 1 removes the Board of Regents from the Nevada constitution, but doesn’t introduce any immediate changes.
Will theaters still be around when viewers are ready to go back?