76°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

LETTER: Taxpayers get stiffed by Metro over public records

I read your recent article regarding the Review-Journal’s settlement with the Metropolitan Police Department. Metro will be required to pay the newspaper a bit more than $600,000 for refusing to provide information in violation of Nevada’s public records law.

I strongly support news agencies in their efforts to obtain information and provide it to the public. The law enforces the public’s right to know what our government agencies are doing, even if (or because) such reporting reveals facts that embarrass the specific agency or leaders. The local newspapers provide an important service to the community in exposing wrongdoing.

May I note, however, that I and my fellow citizens will be paying for the $600,000 judgment.

Why shouldn’t the people who refused or stifled the records request be held responsible for violating Nevada law? Why shouldn’t they receive a hefty fine or jail time? It seems to me that they accomplished what they intended: to delay access to the requested information. By doing so, they deprived me of learning about its contents. Yet, I am the one who pays.

Let’s change that law to include fines and jail time for any and all employees involved in such a violation.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
LETTER: Biden confused over inflation.

All this mismanagement has resulted in the national debt rising at a very alarming rate.

LETTER: Still after the Jan. 6 protesters

So more than three years after the riot, the government is still using taxpayer money and manpower in its vendetta to ferret out Donald Trump supporters.

LETTER: Columbia kids need to learn to pay their own way

Frankly, if I had kids at Columbia who participated in these “protests,” I’d yank them out of school, toss their stuff onto the lawn and tell them to get a job, go live in the real world and pay your own way.

LETTER: Here’s the real threat to democracy

In the 2020 election, Mr. Biden ran on promises he has failed to keep. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

LETTER: No need for an SOS on Social Security

The functional reality is that members of Congress need to keep Social Security alive or they will be voted out of office.